Peer Review Policy

The Holistic Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Innovation (HJMRI) follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality, validity, and integrity of all published articles. The peer review process is central to maintaining the journal's high standards and promoting the dissemination of credible and reliable scientific research.

Key Components of the Peer Review Policy:

  1. Double-Blind Peer Review
    HJMRI uses a double-blind peer review process, meaning both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept anonymous. This method ensures an unbiased evaluation of the submitted manuscripts and fosters fairness in the review process.

  2. Reviewer Selection
    Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject area of the submitted manuscript. HJMRI seeks reviewers with recognized academic qualifications, professional experience, and a proven track record of research excellence. We prioritize selecting experts who can offer constructive feedback to enhance the quality of the manuscript.

  3. Manuscript Evaluation
    Reviewers are asked to assess the manuscript based on several criteria, including but not limited to:

    • Originality: The manuscript presents novel ideas, methodologies, or findings.

    • Scientific Rigor: The research design, methodology, and analysis are robust and well-executed.

    • Relevance: The manuscript contributes to the field and aligns with the journal’s scope.

    • Clarity: The writing is clear, coherent, and well-organized.

    • Ethical Standards: The manuscript adheres to ethical research practices, including appropriate citation of sources and avoidance of plagiarism.

  4. Review Process Timeline
    HJMRI strives to complete the peer review process in a timely manner. Typically, the review process takes 4 to 6 weeks, but this may vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the availability of reviewers. Authors will be notified of the review status and any required revisions as soon as possible.

  5. Confidentiality
    All manuscripts and reviewer comments are treated with the utmost confidentiality. Reviewers are required to respect the confidentiality of the manuscript and must not use or disclose the content of the manuscript during or after the review process.

  6. Decision Making
    Based on the feedback received from the reviewers, the editorial team will make one of the following decisions:

    • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication without further revisions.

    • Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor revisions before it can be accepted for publication.

    • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires substantial revisions, but if these are made, it may be accepted for publication.

    • Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in HJMRI.

    Authors are provided with detailed feedback from reviewers and editors to assist in making the necessary improvements to the manuscript.

  7. Ethical Review
    HJMRI adheres to ethical standards in the peer review process. We expect authors to follow ethical guidelines for research and publication, including obtaining necessary permissions and disclosures, and adhering to standards for research integrity. Any issues regarding potential misconduct, such as plagiarism or conflicts of interest, are thoroughly investigated.

  8. Reviewer Responsibilities
    Reviewers are expected to provide detailed, constructive, and timely feedback. Reviewers should evaluate the manuscript based on its scientific merits and provide suggestions for improvement. They are expected to be impartial and to disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to review the manuscript objectively.

  9. Transparency and Appeals
    HJMRI maintains transparency throughout the peer review process. If an author disagrees with a review decision, they have the right to appeal the decision by providing a well-reasoned explanation. The editorial board will re-evaluate the manuscript and the reviewers' comments, and a final decision will be made in accordance with the journal's guidelines.

By upholding this peer review policy, HJMRI ensures that all published research is of the highest quality, meets ethical standards, and contributes meaningfully to the academic community.